There’s a monster in my closet!

monster

The above drawing was made by the child of a client who requested an investigation. With this exercise the child was asked to draw what she had seen, and this is what she produced: “The Monster in the Closet.” Although there were numerous other paranormal claims taking place within the home, claims that involve children are especially concerning and are always handled with vigilance and extra care. We arrived at about 7pm last night and investigated until 4am this morning. It was a very thorough investigation, and although all the evidence hasn’t been examined yet, it will most likely warrant ongoing contact with the client.

Situations like this remind me of when I was a little girl – I was afraid of a monster who lived under my bed. I would cry for my Dad who would swoop in with a broom yelling and swatting at it. He would go so far as to chase the monster out of my room, down the stairs and out the front door. He would stand in the doorway and yell, “Get out and don’t come back!” All the neighbors probably thought he was crazy, but it made me feel safe & secure and I’d fall asleep within minutes.

Although my personal childhood experience was not rooted in anything paranormal, and what my Dad did was nothing more than theatrics, I liken what I do now as a more elaborate version of what my Dad did for me when I was little – I basically chase monsters and help people feel safe in their own home. That is what ghost hunting is all about, ultimately – helping people.

Even if doing so means all the neighbors think you’re crazy.

Speaking as a Child of the 70s…

my 2nd birthday
The above photo was taken 38 years ago today (when I turned 2). For those of you who are really bad at math, that means it is my 34th birthday. If they don’t kill me first for posting it, I’ll be celebrating by having a quiet breakfast with the other 2 people in the photo - my parents.

These first 40 (or 34…whatever…) years have been pretty awesome. Sure, I’ve had my shitty days, but I can’t say it any better than Sinatra can sing it: Regrets, I’ve had a few. But then again, too few to mention. So far the good in my life has outweighed the bad by such a large margin that the only word to describe it would be ”lucky,” and for that I am tremendously thankful.

Some of the milestones, memories and life lessons I’ve learned…

  • First movie I ever saw: Star Wars
  • First television memory: The Monkees
  • First kiss: 3rd grade, Eric Leip
  • I’ve been to hundreds (if not thousands) of concerts. Most of them Pearl Jam.
  • Out of all the awards and trinkets I own, my most prized possession is a cocktail napkin I swiped from a Rose Garden reception at the White House. I even framed it.
  • I’ve participated in 5 Super Bowl halftime shows.
  • Best 3 sunsets: #3. Over the Rockies. #2. Over the Pacific. #1. Over the Badlands.
  • I was once almost killed by a buffalo. (Fact: Buffalo are fast! And did you know they are strong enough to overturn a car?)
  • Life lesson learned the hard way: Always get the extra car rental insurance. Always.
  • So far I’ve had 5 major surgeries and several minor procedures. I am missing just about every organ you don’t actually need to live.
  • Always trust your gut: This cat needed a home and my apartment didn’t allow pets, so I bought a condo. It was the best snap decision I ever made.
  • I’ve had the pleasure of raising a pint with sports stars, rap stars, rock stars and Bering Sea crab fishermen. The most fun to party with? Hands down – crab fishermen.
  • The most important life lesson I’ve learned: The only things you truly take with you are your experiences, and that’s the meaning of life – to relish the human experience. That’s what the meaning of my life is, anyway. At least for the foreseeable future.

Now on to the next 40. Or 34. Whatever.

A dirty, creative mind…

Norman Reedus as Daryl Dixon as Pig Pen

Over the years a lot of people have asked me where my creativity comes from, or how I come up with ideas. Honestly, sometimes you don’t know you even have an idea until you see something and then suddenly it grabs hold of some other long forgotten image or bit of information in your head and they have an evening of unbridled passion. The result can be either you wind up doing a walk of shame wondering how your brain could have ever gone there, or you’re left with a fun little idea that you love so much it makes you giggle.

Case in point: Earlier this week I did the above doodle of The Walking Dead’s Daryl Dixon as Pig Pen from the Peanuts cartoons. Why? Because a while back I read an interview with Norman Reedus (the actor who plays Daryl) and he said of his character…

He cleans up every once in a while. I’m always asking Donna our makeup person for more dirt. It’s become kind of a joke on set that I don’t want anyone dirtier than me. Same with blood. I get jealous if another person has more blood and dirt than me.

When I read that quote it made me think that if Daryl the adult was so dirty, Daryl the child must have been even dirtier. That vision of a childhood Daryl then morphed into Pig Pen and that was… well… that. Of course, I had to doodle the thought out otherwise Daryl as Pig Pen would have been stuck in my brain dirtying it up.

So to answer the initial question: Creativite inspiration comes from everywhere, and you don’t have to be an artist or designer to have a creative mind. Einstein was able to formulate complex theories on how our universe operates by watching a rock drop into a pool of water, or by looking at a clock while riding on a train. It makes me think all the answers are out there – it just takes the right set of eyes to look at them at the right moment.

So start looking.

Paranormal or Pareidolia?

debunking a ghostly shadow

One of my first paranormal investigations was at an old armory that was currently being used as a community center. They were perplexed by a shadowy figure that kept appearing by the door in several photographs. The above left photo is one of the original photographs from the client. The photo on the right I took during our investigation (again, one of several). I was able to recreate the figure almost exactly using nothing more than a standard camera auto-flash. Although the wood grain in the door was not in the shape of a human head and shoulders – slight indentations reflected the flash in just the right way to create that effect.

There is a psychological phenomenon called Pareidolia which is basically the mind’s ability to see familiar patterns in complex shapes. (The Rorschach inkblot test is a good example to illustrate how Pareidolia works.) Unfortunately, for our investigation the above evidenced photos show a psychological phenomenon, not a paranormal one.

De-branding

one of the many style guides I have read

Welcome to roughly the kabillionth version of this website. I started it sometime back in the mid-90s under AOL’s free web space. Over the years it has had various looks as well as domains, and has been ripped down and re-built too many times to mention. (Yes, I kill my darlings.)

The previous incarnation of this site was for my final portfolio project for RISD’s Web Design and Development program. Although at the time the site served its purpose (it helped me graduate) – it didn’t serve my personal needs much, and as a result I didn’t care for it much. It was nothing more than an exercise in branding. I can understand why the good folks at RISD wanted me and the other students to brand ourselves and thus, our sites. However, I have worked for an NFL team since 1999. I work in one of the most brand managed industries out there. I rattle off PMS numbers and logo usage guidelines in my sleep.

Needless to say, I do not want my personal site to become that. I want this to be like my little home on the web - comfy, welcoming, somewhat minimalistic and where I can gab about anything and everything that strikes my fancy. I’m still working away at this, and plan on having my portfolio up here soon, so please have a seat on some of the mismatched furniture and stay for a while. I’ll put some coffee on.

Candies Girl

The latest imagery for Candies featuring Britney Spears is out along with the unretouched originals. The Daily Mail says that it was Britney herself who demanded their release, but they are not giving credit to any named source for statements like: “Britney is proud of her body – imperfections and all.” OK, so, if she’s so damn proud why can’t you credit who said that? I’m with Jezebel – I’ll wait for some more info on these images before I stand up and applaud anyone.

Anyway, here are the images (below) – Brit looks damn good regardless, but you can see the extensive work on her legs, butt, thighs and waist. On the bottom image you can even see how they elongated her legs so they appear slimmer and so she looks taller.

Britney Spears Candies ad

[mouse over to see the original image]

Britney Spears Candies ad

[mouse over to see the original image]

Debunking the Frozen Coyote

frozen coyote

The photo above is supposedly of a coyote who “literally froze dead in his tracks” at -28 degrees. (Fahrenheit? Centigrade? The site does not specify.) In reality this photo was achieved by simply putting a stuffed and mounted coyote outside, waiting for it to snow and then photographing it. Warm blooded creatures do not freeze to death “mid-stride”.

Usually when we think of fake photos we think of politics, magazine covers or advertisements, but we hardly ever think about weather. Well, Jesse Ferrell who works for AccuWeather.com is bringing to light some of the fake photos that have plagued the weather community for years (via the infamous email forward), and also exposing false reports. It is a subject he cares about deeply and blogs about with passion, so I already consider him the This Looks Shopped representative of the weather world. Here are some of Jesse’s blog entries about fake and hoax weather-related photos that I think make for interesting reading…

January 25, 2010 – The Huntington Beach Waterspout Photo Hoax

January 24, 2010 – R U Fooled by Recent Weather Photo Hoaxes?

October 11, 2009 – Weather Channel Fooled by Lightning Photo

July 1, 2009 – National Weather Service Fooled by Fake Storm Reports

April 25, 2006 – Classic Emailed Weather Photo Hoaxes

Who you gonna call? Shopbusters!

fake ghost image

A really great fake ghostly image that WASN’T Shopped! See how the photographer created it.

In doing research for this post I came to the realization that there are a ton of modern fake ghost photos out there, and a lot of them are really, really, reeeeeally bad. Some were even too poorly Shopped to make mention of on this site, and you just know how I love me some bad Shops! As mentioned in a previous post, ghosts were made with the double exposure trick in the olden days of photography. Today, however, they are created by cutting, pasting and opacity changing with a generous helping of the blur tool (which is essentially the digital way of doing a double exposure).

And, seriously, orbs? Don’t even get me started.

Paranormal investigation is serious business though, and there are groups out there that are trying to do some genuine legit research in this field while debunking frauds. Even though I look over everything with a skeptic’s eye, I will admit publicly here for the first time that I once had an encounter I was unable to explain (and my eyes were working just fine that day, thanks).

So, I am unwilling to completely dismiss all ghostly claims, but I do feel that a good portion of photos (and video) presented as “evidence” are explainable. Even if a photo has not been Shopped at all, there are still explanations for ghostly imagery such as smudges on the camera lens, smoke, dust, lens flare, and Pareidolia (the mind’s tendency to see familiar shapes in complex patterns) and heck, even the old camera strap can be to blame sometimes. Before claiming an image is paranormal evidence, be sure to exhaust all other possibilities.

I ain’t afraid of no … double exposure…

Most people think with the advent of digital photography and Photoshop that hoax ghost images are easier to create than they were in the days of film and dark rooms. Not so. Many “ghostly” images were created simply with prolonged or double exposures (whether intentional or accidental). Here are 2 examples from the American Museum of Photography

The Vanishing Lamplighter

The first ghosts in photographs were the result of accidents. During a long exposure – such as those required in photography’s infancy – a person who stood still would register as clearly as a building. But a person who moved out of camera range after only a portion of the exposure was completed would instead appear as a see-through blur. It happened with the lamplighter in this detail from a photograph by the London Stereoscopic Company. To the right, another figure can be seen–a gawker who did not stay around long enough to be immortalized by the camera.

[From the American Museum of Photography]

Woman with Daisies and Spirit (circa 1875)

From a technical standpoint, this is a highly unusual photograph. Tintypes were made directly on a painted metal plate, without the use of a negative, thus eliminating the possibility of most forms of darkroom manipulation. In addition, the image needed to be exposed and developed before the sensitive coating on the plate had time to dry out. For that reason, the woman who is being “haunted” must have been a knowing participant in the production of this picture. She would have been required to hold her position for an exposure lasting several seconds; part of the way through that exposure, the shrouded figure would have stepped out of the frame.”

[From the American Museum of Photography]

It was the accidental double exposures such as the lamplighter image which gave way to the idea of intentional double exposures (known as spirit photography) as in the daisies example. Spirit photography was mainly done for fun, but was taken seriously and used as “evidence” by others. William H. Mumler claimed that he had taken actual photographic records of ghosts, and was put on trial for fraud because of it. At the trial several photographers testified against Mumler and showed the dark room trickery he used to produce such images, but the judge dropped the charges due to lack of evidence.

In my next post, I will bring you back to the future and discuss the digital side of spiritual trickery, but if you wish to see some more of the older spiritual imagery please check out the following links…

Science vs. Seance [American Museum of Photography]

A Ghostly Gallery [American Museum of Photography]

William H. Mumler [American Museum of Photography]

The Spirit Photographs of William Hope [National Media Museum]

Um … yes we can?

[mouse over to see the original image]

Above: Just a few of the fake photos of Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin. [Source: News of the World]

On Friday, Republican Party Presidential hopeful John McCain announced Alaska’s Governor Sarah Palin as his VP pick. I could tell that Palin – a former beauty queen who has been dubbed “America’s Hottest Governor” – would very soon have to deal with her first fake photo scandal (with probably many more to come).

Such slanderous fakery reminds me of the fake photo that was published during the 2004 Presidential campaign that showed John Kerry and Jane Fonda at an anti-Vietnam War rally. It was obviously created to bring about doubts of Kerry’s patriotism and to tarnish his war record…

This was a bit more of a scandal at the time, as it was credited as an AP photo and it was no such thing. (AP threatened to take legal action, but it was too difficult to find who created the faked image.) It was actually a composite of 2 images taken from the historical archives of Corbis

Left: original photo of John Kerry taken on June 13, 1971 at an anti-war rally in Mineola, NY. [source] Right: original image of Jane Fonda taken in August, 1972 speaking at a rally in Miami Beach, FL. [source]

I don’t care which side of the political coin you are on – fakes to this extent are just wrong. They amount to nothing more than slanderous cheap shots by people who don’t have the intelligence to debate the legitimate issues at hand. Just as candidates for public office should be questioned about their stances on the issues, so should imagery of them that gets passed around the internet. It is up to the public and news organizations to do the questioning on all fronts.